Event: Elon Musk # tweets August 13 – August 15, 2026? The market asks: Will Elon Musk p…

This market will resolve according to the number of times Elon Musk (@elonmusk), posts on X from August 13 12:00 PM ET to August 15, 2026 12:00 PM…

Closed marketArchived market

Elon Musk # tweets August 13 - August 15, 2026?

Will Elon Musk post <40 tweets from August 13 to August 15, 2026?

Primary signalNo
Probability100.0%
ResolutionAug 15, 2026
ResolutionAug 15, 2026
Signal board

Price, depth and useful dates

An editorial view of the signal: what leads, how much activity is behind it, and which date carries the risk.

Source on Polymarket
Archived marketNoNo
Total volume$672.5KAll-time traded activity
24 hour volume$317.1KRecent market attention
Liquidity$62.3KDepth available around prices
Open interest$144.6KCapital still exposed
ResolutionAug 15, 2026Next active phase close
Price convictionStrongLeader is priced with very high conviction.
Active scenarios

Archived market

Open phases only
NoWill Elon Musk post <40 tweets from August 13 to August 15,...
100.0%
YesWill Elon Musk post <40 tweets from August 13 to August 15,...
0.0%
Editorial analysisCurrent situation and market structure

What is happening now

The market tracks whether Elon Musk will post 40-64 tweets on X (formerly Twitter) between August 13-15, 2026, with “Yes” priced at 15.5% and “No” at 84.5%. This is part of a broader ladder market segmenting tweet volumes into ranges (e.g., <40, 40-64, 65-89, etc.). The "40-64" range is the most actively traded, with $46.3M volume, while higher ranges (e.g., 65-89 at 58% "Yes") show moderate interest. Deleted posts count if captured within ~5 minutes, and replies on the main feed are included. The resolution source is X’s public data, with Polymarket’s tracker as primary.

How the market is structured

This is a price-ladder market with discrete ranges. Each rung represents a tweet count threshold (e.g., “40-64” requires 40-64 posts). The “40-64” market leads with 15.5% “Yes” odds, while “65-89” sits at 58% “Yes.” Lower ranges (<40) are resolved at 100% "No," indicating near-certainty Musk won’t post fewer than 40 tweets. Higher ranges (90-114+) are heavily "No"-biased (76-100% "No").

Key outcomes

  • 40-64 tweets: 15.5% “Yes” (84.5% “No”) – most liquid, $46.3M volume.
  • 65-89 tweets: 58% “Yes” (42% “No”) – moderate liquidity, $36.6M volume.
  • 90-114 tweets: 24% “Yes” (76% “No”) – lower liquidity, $44.9M volume.

Path to the leading outcome

For “40-64 tweets” to resolve “Yes,” Musk must post between 40-64 times during the 3-day window. Historical context: Musk averaged ~10-15 tweets/day in 2023, but activity varies. Recent trends show increased engagement ahead of product launches (e.g., X Premium updates) or controversies. If he maintains ~15-20 tweets/day, the “40-64” range becomes likely.

What could change the pricing

Pricing could shift if:

  • Musk’s activity spikes: A viral post or policy announcement could drive tweet volume above 65.
  • Market liquidity dries up: Low open interest ($15.5M total) suggests limited arbitrage opportunities.
  • Resolution source discrepancies: If Polymarket’s tracker lags behind X’s data, disputes could arise.

Editorial read

The market reflects skepticism about Musk’s near-term tweet volume, with “40-64” as the sole plausible range. At 15.5% “Yes,” traders imply a 1-in-6 chance he’ll hit this bracket, likely requiring sustained, non-viral activity. The “65-89” range’s 58% “Yes” suggests optimism for higher engagement but lacks liquidity to challenge the leader. With 24h volume at $196M (80% of total), the market is active but not deeply liquid. Resolution on August 15 hinges on real-time data accuracy, as Polymarket’s tracker may not capture all posts. If Musk’s behavior remains consistent, “40-64” will likely resolve “No,” but a sudden surge could flip the odds.

Editorial market brief.
This analysis is provided for informational and editorial purposes only. Market signal prices reflect market-implied expectations, not verified outcomes or recommendations. Markets can be illiquid, volatile, and subject to ambiguous resolution criteria.