US-Iran 14-Day Ceasefire Clock: Polymarket Odds Across September Deadlines
This market will resolve to “Yes” if there is a continuous 14-day period during which the United States does not take a qualifying military action against Iran that…
US x Iran Effective Ceasefire begins by...? (2 week pause)
US x Iran Effective Ceasefire by September 4?

Price, depth and useful dates
An editorial view of the signal: what leads, how much activity is behind it, and which date carries the risk.
Archived market
What is happening now
How the market is structured
Path to the leading outcome
What could change the pricing
Editorial read
The Polymarket event provides a clear, quantifiable snapshot of market sentiment ahead of the broader geopolitical calculus surrounding US-Iran relations. The data suggests that traders are increasingly confident the ceasefire will be achieved by late September, with probability climbing from 52.5% (by September 7) to 75.5% (by September 30). This gradual tightening reflects a cautious but optimistic stance: the market assumes no immediate escalation and prices in the likelihood that diplomatic channels will prevail. However, the market remains binary and binary-resolving—if a strike occurs, the entire narrative flips. In practice, these markets function as early-warning instruments; they do not predict war but rather encode the probability that the US will choose restraint through the critical final weeks of September. The structural design—a date-ladder of escalating confidence—makes the outcome interpretable: the sooner the ceasefire begins, the lower the probability assigned to “No” across all markets. For anyone monitoring the situation, the key signal to watch is whether any US military action against Iran surfaces; everything else is secondary noise.
- Polymarket event page: US x Iran Effective Ceasefire begins by…? (2 week pause)
- Market shape and outcome board: US x Iran Effective Ceasefire begins by…?
This analysis is provided for informational and editorial purposes only. Market signal prices reflect market-implied expectations, not verified outcomes or recommendations. Markets can be illiquid, volatile, and subject to ambiguous resolution criteria.