We must follow rules: 45-80 characters preferred, max 95. No generic suffixes like “Mark…

This market will resolve according to the number of times Elon Musk (@elonmusk), posts on X from August 25 12:00 PM ET to September 1, 2026 12:00 PM…

Closed marketArchived market

Elon Musk # tweets August 25 - September 1, 2026?

Will Elon Musk post 0-19 tweets from August 25 to September 1, 2026?

Primary signalNo
Probability100.0%
ResolutionSep 1, 2026
ResolutionSep 1, 2026
Signal board

Price, depth and useful dates

An editorial view of the signal: what leads, how much activity is behind it, and which date carries the risk.

Source on Polymarket
Archived marketNoNo
Total volume$2.6MAll-time traded activity
24 hour volume$759.6KRecent market attention
Liquidity$1.2MDepth available around prices
Open interest$399.9KCapital still exposed
ResolutionSep 1, 2026Next active phase close
Price convictionStrongLeader is priced with very high conviction.
Active scenarios

Archived market

Open phases only
NoWill Elon Musk post 0-19 tweets from August 25 to September 1,...
100.0%
YesWill Elon Musk post 0-19 tweets from August 25 to September 1,...
0.0%
Editorial analysisCurrent situation and market structure

What is happening now

Polymarket is running a 26-bucket ladder asking how many posts Elon Musk will publish on his @elonmusk X account between 12:00 PM ET on August 25 and 12:00 PM ET on September 1, 2026. The window is roughly four-fifths complete, with the market updated as of August 28, 2026. Two lower buckets — <20 and 20-39 — have already been ruled out and are closed at 0% “Yes.” The trading action is now concentrated in the 100-219 range, where the implied probability mass is sitting.

Across all open buckets, total event volume has reached roughly $799K, with about $238K traded in the last 24 hours and open interest near $177K, according to the event’s Polymarket page. Resolution uses the xtracker.polymarket.com post counter, which captures only main-feed posts, quote posts and reposts — replies off the main feed are excluded.

How the market is structured

This is a price-threshold range ladder, not a binary yes/no. Each $20-wide bucket from <20 up to 480-499, plus a 500+ tail, is its own mini-market. The 40-59 bucket — the one highlighted in the prompt — is trading at 0.15% “Yes,” essentially eliminated because Musk has long since cleared that range.

With the sub-40 outcomes closed, the meaningful signal is where the bulk of implied probability now lives. The top four open buckets on the outcome board are:

  • 140-159: “No” at 79.3% — implied 20.8% chance of hitting
  • 120-139: “No” at 81.3% — implied 18.8%
  • 160-179: “No” at 81.5% — implied 18.5%
  • 100-119: “No” at 88.4% — implied 11.6%

Outside that cluster, the 180-199 and 200-219 buckets sit at roughly 11.5% and 6.5% respectively, then probability decays sharply above 220 and below 80. The implied center of the distribution is in the 120-179 corridor.

Path to the leading outcome

For the 140-159 bucket to resolve “Yes,” Musk would need to land inside that 20-tweet window when the tracker freezes at 12:00 PM ET on September 1. With four days already elapsed in the window, that requires him to continue posting at roughly the same cadence that has carried him to the current pace. The polymarket xtracker figure is the only official reference, and traders can pull the running count from its “Export Data” tab to project forward.

Two structural features support the cluster: first, Musk has historically posted heavily when reacting to news cycles, product launches at Tesla or SpaceX, or political triggers; second, late-week posting spikes are common, and the remaining window includes a U.S. Labor Day weekend where engagement typically rises.

What could change the pricing

Three concrete developments could shift the distribution:

  • A sustained posting surge or freeze. If Musk begins publishing well above his recent daily average, the implied mass would migrate toward 180-219 and beyond; if he goes quiet, probability would collapse back toward 100-119 or lower.
  • Account-level disruption. Suspensions, rate limits, or a switch to replies-only posting on the main feed would mechanically shrink the count and push the implied range lower.
  • Tracker disputes. Deleted posts that stay up for more than ~5 minutes count, and community reposts do not. Any contested deletion in the final 48 hours could force UMA or Polymarket to fall back on X itself as a secondary source, per the rules.

The thin “Yes” tails above 220 (all under 3%) show traders are not pricing in a runaway posting binge, but those tails tend to widen if a single news event dominates the back half of the window.

Editorial read

The market has already passed the point of suspense on the low end — Musk is comfortably past 40 posts — and the only real question is where the final count lands inside the dense 100-219 corridor. Liquidity is healthy, with $20K-$30K+ deployed in each of the top buckets and $552K in event-level liquidity, so price discovery on the implied range is reasonably efficient. With resolution locked to the xtracker counter on September 1, the actionable signal is the current running total, not the headline “Yes/No” on any single strike.

Editorial market brief.
This analysis is provided for informational and editorial purposes only. Market signal prices reflect market-implied expectations, not verified outcomes or recommendations. Markets can be illiquid, volatile, and subject to ambiguous resolution criteria.