Will Iran Pledge to Surrender Enriched Uranium Stockpile by June 30 2026?

This market will resolve to "Yes" if Iran publicly agrees to surrender its enriched uranium stockpile by March 31, 2026, 11:59 PM ET. Otherwise, this market will resolve…

Closed marketDeadline map

Iran agrees to surrender enriched uranium stockpile by...?

Several deadline markets are grouped under one Polymarket event. Closed dates are archived; the live view focuses only on active deadlines.

Primary signalJune 30
Probability91.5%
ResolutionJun 30, 2026
ResolutionJun 30, 2026
Signal board

Price, depth and useful dates

An editorial view of the signal: what leads, how much activity is behind it, and which date carries the risk.

Source on Polymarket
Deadline mapJune 30No
Total volume$13.5MAll-time traded activity
24 hour volume$771.5KRecent market attention
Liquidity$256.1KDepth available around prices
Open interest$778.4KCapital still exposed
ResolutionJun 30, 2026Next active phase close
Price convictionStrongLeader is priced with very high conviction.
Active scenarios

Deadline map

Open phases only
June 30No side
91.5%
July 31No side
79.5%
December 31No side
61.5%
Editorial analysisCurrent situation and market structure

What is happening now

The current market dynamics revolve around Iran’s potential agreement to surrender its uranium stockpile, a pivotal event with cascading implications. Recent developments indicate heightened geopolitical tensions, with stakeholders closely monitoring Iran’s strategic decisions. The event’s immediacy underscores its role as a catalyst for uncertainty, influencing liquidity and pricing across related markets.

How the market is structured

This event forms a date ladder with three distinct deadlines: June 30, July 31, and December 31, 2026. Each stage represents a critical juncture where outcomes shift probabilities. The structure reflects binary outcomes tied to compliance, with no intermediate results. The absence of additional outcomes simplifies resolution mechanisms, emphasizing reliance on predefined thresholds.

Path to the leading outcome

The primary outcome hinges on Iran’s agreement before its respective deadlines. A failure to comply results in a “No” resolution, while compliance leads to a “Yes.” The current trajectory favors the former, given historical precedents of non-adherence. Market participants anticipate delays or rejections, reinforcing the likelihood of the “No” outcome.

What could change the pricing

Any deviation from the expected timeline—such as non-cooperation or external pressures—could alter pricing dynamics. For instance, prolonged uncertainty might push prices toward the “No” level, while eventual compliance could lower them. However, such shifts depend on external factors beyond the event’s control, necessitating close monitoring.

Editorial read

The event’s significance lies in its potential to redefine regional stability and market expectations. Its resolution will have ripple effects, impacting global energy markets and diplomatic relations. Clarity on Iran’s stance remains paramount to mitigating volatility.

The situation demands sustained attention, as outcomes remain contingent on immediate actions and external influences. Current data underscores the urgency of resolving this matter definitively.

Editorial market brief.
This analysis is provided for informational and editorial purposes only. Market signal prices reflect market-implied expectations, not verified outcomes or recommendations. Markets can be illiquid, volatile, and subject to ambiguous resolution criteria.