Companies Editor's Picks

Upbit moves most user funds to cold storage

Photorealistic crypto cold storage vault with glowing hardware wallets and tokens entering offline safes.

Upbit moved the bulk of customer assets into cold storage after a hot wallet breach on 27 November 2025 that drained an estimated $30–38.5 million in Solana-based tokens, the exchange said.

The breach was detected at about 04:42 a.m. KST on 27 November 2025 and affected tokens including SOL, TRUMP, BONK and JUP. Upbit suspended all deposits and withdrawals as it began emergency incident handling. The timing drew scrutiny: the exploit occurred on the sixth anniversary of a prior Upbit breach and amid reporting of a proposed $10 billion merger with Naver Financial, increasing commercial and reputational pressure on the exchange.

Upbit moved 99% of user funds to offline cold storage, a change that exceeds South Korea’s existing requirement to keep 80% of assets offline. The exchange retired the compromised hot wallets, purged old deposit addresses, and completed a broad reissue of deposit endpoints to new addresses. Forensics identified a private-key inference vulnerability that could allow attackers to deduce private keys by analysing multiple wallet addresses; Upbit said that discovery prompted systematic remediation across its wallet architecture.

To protect customers, the platform pledged full reimbursement for affected users and recorded a corporate loss of 5.9 billion won to cover 38.6 billion won in member assets.

Upbit moves most user funds to cold storage

Investigators have flagged patterns consistent with state-linked groups; analysts and authorities have pointed to the Lazarus Group as a prime suspect given similarities in credential compromise, cross-chain asset movements and the use of privacy-mixing services. The incident also renews scrutiny of the Solana ecosystem, which has previously experienced wallet and client-side failures in 2022 and 2023.

Policymakers in Seoul are considering tighter measures, including proposals for “no-fault liability” that would compel exchanges to compensate users for losses regardless of negligence — a regulatory shift that could reshape operational and capital requirements for custodians.

The hack forced Upbit into a near-total cold-storage posture and exposed an architectural weakness with direct balance-sheet and regulatory consequences. The incident highlights the tension between liquidity for users and hardened custody controls that compliance and product teams must reconcile.

Related posts

Ethereum briefly hits $4,500 amid ETF inflows and whale selling debate

noah

Binance Reinstates Visa and Mastercard Services Amidst Regulatory Settlements

jose

FTX Spent $40M on Luxurious Hotels, Flights, and Foods

Jai Hamid